I have expressed fairness concerns about the proposed Dell insider
LBO. See the February 8, 2013 post “The dell LBO: Existing Shareholders Lookout
Below”. Until recently, it appeared that despite the resistance of minority
shareholders like Southeastern, the deal would proceed at the original $13.65
per share offer price. Quite simply, no other bidder could or would challenge
the Michael Dell-Silver Lake sponsored deal, which Dell’s board had blessed as
the best alternative. Luckily for the minority shareholders, not so lucky for
Mr. Dell, et al, Carl Ichan has entered the fray. He is proposing a special $9
per share shareholder distribution funded via use of excess cash and debt. He
believes the this combined with the remaining “stub” value of $13.80 per shares
offers a better value for all shareholders-not just Michael Dell-Silver Lake.
The nub of the issue is related party LBOs is always prone
to abuse. The proposed Dell deal is especially suspect given its large cash
position. Undoubtedly, as 4Q12 results indicate, Dell’s legacy PC business
continues to decline. Nonetheless, it remains cash positive and has large
liquid resources. The offer price, although representing a substantial premium
over the pre-offer trading price, is at a large discount to Dell’s 52 week high
price-a usual selling shareholder reference point. Furthermore, based publicly
available information, a higher fundamentals based price could be reasonably
crafted. Dell’s share price has increased following the mounting pressure by
about $1 per share as investors sense that the offer price needs to raise to
avoid Ichan’s ‘years of litigation’ threat.
Some lessons I see from this unfolding sequence of events are
as follows:
1)
Honesty is still the best policy: The Dell “short
sighted market doesn’t understand” the reason for going private which was never
very convincing. Trying to complete a turnaround in a highly leveraged LBO
structure would complicate not simplify the prospects. The real reason was to
capture the upside benefits for the buyout group-in particular the large net $7.4B
available cash position. Interestingly, the Dell group plans to bring the
foreign cash home and pay the tax penalties after years of saying it could or
would not return the cash due to tax considerations.
2)
Sharing is nice: Consider sharing the upside
with Dell’s long suffering shareholders rather than trying to keep it all. A
special shareholder distribution involving utilization of available net cash
and a debt financed share repurchase would have allowed shareholders to
participate in the transaction. Also, it could have avoided the auction
requirements in a going private transaction. I would love to see the Board’s
analysis in rejecting this alternative.
3)
Don’t be a pig: Absent sharing, at least offer a
price that does not embarrass existing shareholders like Southeastern who has a
$15-16 investment basis. Let them walk away- if not happy –at least not mad.
4)
Over disclose to increase the trust level:
Provide valuation information to an independent third party like The
Shareholder Forum, Inc with appropriate confidentially safeguards. This would
supplement the less independent traditional fairness opinion provided by the
company hired investment bank.
5)
The Michael Dell Rule: When he is buying you
should not be selling. He does not appear to be minority shareholder friendly.
Ultimately, the next steps in the
drama include Dell dropping the deal, increasing the price, providing more
information, or letting the shareholders share in the deal. God bless Carl
Ichan-he is doing God’s work here-of course for a fee, but that is ok.
J
Hey, it’s so great I really want to appreciate to this particular website. It’s so much intriguing make a difference I love your hard work. You need to continue with your hard work along with post everyone this kind of amazing article.
ReplyDeletePositive cash flow investments USA