Ralph and I have previously mentioned the difference between
price as a fact and value as an opinion. (See, for example, Value is Estimated, Price is Paid.) Nonetheless, many remain rightfully
confused by a firm whose stock is trading at $20 p/s receiving a takeover offer
for $30 p/s. Specifically, was the $20
price wrong or is the $30 offer a mistake? While it is possible for either the
market price or offer to be wrong-it is also possible they are both right, but
under different circumstances.
As an opinion, value is truly in the eyes of the beholder.
Equally true, there is no one true intrinsic value based on a firm’s cash flows
(magnitude and timing) and risk. Think of valuation as an attempt to price
expected operating performance. This in turn depends on the firm’s market
environment and the strategy and asset-liability combinations employed by
management in the execution of their chosen strategy. Thus, different
owner-manager teams can different results from the same firm.
Changes in the industry environment from technology and regulation
shifts for example can render existing strategies obsolete. Existing management
may be unable or reluctant to change, thinking the changes to be cyclical not
structural. Performance under these conditions starts to decline and the firm’s
stock price begins to decline as passive minority shareholders begin to vote
with their feet by selling their shares. These selling shareholders have priced
downward from say $30 p/s to $20 the firm’s expected operating performance
based on its current strategies in a changed market. They no longer share
management’s expectations.
The price decline attracts the attention of others who see
profit opportunities from shifting to alternative higher value strategies, asset
-liability combinations and improved management execution of the strategies.
These investors are active control shareholders seeking to force a change. This
in turn requires a significant ownership position or majority to implement
their plans. These investors are prepared to obtain this position by offering a
premium to existing shareholders of $30.
Their price is not based on the firm’s expected operating performance as
currently configured. Rather, it reflects their view of operating performance
under a new higher value strategy and management team.
This illustrates that firms trade in two different financial
markets, and at two different prices. The first represents the passive minority
interest market, for example, the firm’s current Bloomberg terminal price,
based on existing strategies and management. The other is a potentially higher
price to alternative owners employing different strategies and management; this
price is available in the market for corporate control. Of course, the new
investors can be wrong. They are, however, willing to back up their beliefs with
real capital. Thus, their position can have more credibility than a simple
existing management denial – a management who may be more interested in keeping
their jobs than in creating shareholder value.
So next time before assuming the share price is right first
make sure you specify which price you mean. The right price depends on the
right combination of owners, strategies and management, and this combination
changes over time.
J