The selection of the acquisition payment currency has
important implications for both the seller and buyer. So far in this century
about 55% of deals are cash, 23% combination and 22% stock. The proportion of
cash and combination deals has increased since the elimination of Pooling
of Interests accounting in 2001. Like all M&A items, the selection is
negotiated and depends on the relative points of views of the buyer and seller
regarding whether the risks and rewards of the acquisition should be shared.
The simplest approach is use cash, but sometimes that is not always possible.
Buyer considerations regarding the use of stock in whole or
part include the following:
1) Valuation: consider not only the seller’s
valuation, but also that of the buyer’s post transaction value to gauge the
exchange ratio impact. The buyer should never use its shares if it believes
them to be undervalued; whereas, it should use its shares if it believes them
to be over-valued and the seller will accept them. An extreme example of this
is AOL’s purchase of Time
Warner.
2) Synergy Risk: use cash if synergy risk is deemed low to keep the
upside and stock if high to share the risk. Facebook’s recent high priced
acquisitions are primary stock transactions. This helps cushion the downside
should the early stage technology targets fail to work out as planned.
3) Market Risk: if shares are used then you need to
decide who bears the market risk of the shares changing price after the offer
is made but pre close. The options include a fixed price deal where the buyer
assumes the risk, a fixed share arrangement where the seller takes the risks or
using collars and caps to share the risk. (See our post Acquisition Risk, Collars, and the Comast Time Warner Deal.)
4) Dilution: this includes both ownership and
earnings dilution. Whenever new shares are issued the relative ownership
positions of existing shareholders declines. This can be an important control
issue for middle market firms and argue for a cash deal. Buyer earnings and
earnings per share (EPS) always increase in a debt financed cash transaction
provided the target’s earning exceed the incremental after tax interest cost on
the debt. In stock transactions the new shares issued can cause a decline
(dilution) in EPS if the seller’s price-earnings ratio exceeds that of the
buyer. Over time, the EPS dilution should decline as earnings grow. Usually, buyers
prefer a breakeven dilution of 2-3 years.
5) Taxes: the buyer prefers a taxable transaction
involving all or a substantial portion of the price to be in cash. This allows
the write-up of the assets acquired by the buyer and higher future tax deductions. Other
considerations include changing tax domicile to lower tax rates as in the Pfizer-AstraZeneca
bid.
6) Credit Rating: debt financed cash transactions impact the buyer’s target debt rating.
Seller considerations include:
1) Valuation: the seller needs to value the buyer’s
shares on a post acquisition basis to determine what if any premium it actually
receives. This means doing due diligence on the buyer. These valuation issues
explain why targets in hostile takeovers prefer cash over stock as AstraZeneca
is now demanding from Pfizer. Remember the old joke - daddy I sold my bike for $20,000-
I traded it for 2 $10,000 marbles. The value of marbles, like the buyer’s
shares, is an opinion. Cash, however is a fact.
2) Taxes: sellers can defer capital gains taxes if
the transaction is structured as a tax free share exchange. Unfortunately, this
has negative tax implications for the buyer which will probably be reflected in
the offer price.
3) Liquidity: the focus is on the float of the
shares to be received, lock-ups and registration rights.
Bottom line for me is the KISS principle (keep it simple
stupid). It is usually cheaper for the buyer to pay in cash. This may reflect
Warren Buffett’s apparent preference for cash purchases. Sellers will have an
easier task of evaluating the offer and less risk in cash deals. Thus, being a
simple guy, I recommend cash transactions whenever possible. If not using cash, be sure you are at least as smart as the other side.
J
No comments:
Post a Comment