As the Paul Simon song goes “… when times are mysterious
serious numbers will always be heard…after all is said and done… two becomes
one.” This may explain what is happening in the Venture Capital driven tech
world with its current nose bleed valuations/pricing. Venture Capital, like its
related deal market cousins-Real Estate and Private Equity, is cyclical.
Venture Investing is based on funding capacity not fundamentals as investors,
especially limited partners, chase past yields.
The cycle runs as follows:
1)
High returns from successful exits triggers more
fund raising
2)
Funds scammer to invest raised funds leading to
increased deal competition and pricing
3)
Higher pricing producers lower returns and
accidents which reduces fund raising
4)
Less funding capacity leads to reduced pricing,
better deals and higher returns
5)
Repeat cycle
Funds are unable to resist due the Prisoner's
Dilemma problem. We last saw this in the 1990s with the dotcom boom and
bust. The bust lasted until 2012 as funds worked thru their problems and
investor memories dissipated. In 2013, Venture Capital enjoyed its highest
return since 1999 according to Cambridge Assoc due to some highly successful IPOs.
Investors rushed in to invest and fund raising exploded. Tech pricings have
followed suit.
Venture funds have developed a new approach to invest this
embarrassment of riches accelerated funding. It follows from the observation
that the highest returns (note-NOT risk adjusted) are from the largest exits.
In this winner- take- all environment (first mover advantage?) it pays to
identify winners (start-ups on the verge of breaking out) early and bet/invest
heavily in them regardless of current prices. This, of course pre-supposes you
can identify those winners before anyone else. This seems like a stretch given
the hundreds of firms looking for such winners.
Essentially what is happening, in my view, given the lack of
a fundamentals based valuation anchor, is the former series A seed capital
financing round is morphing into a hybrid series B growth financing round.
Series B, however, had required an externally based proof of concept with a
viable revenue model. This seems to missing in the application of the
accelerated funding model. The impact of
this development is pricing for IPOs and related M&A is skyrocketing as no
one wants to avoid missing the next Facebook. This assumes Facebook ‘s success
is based on repeatable skill not luck. The result is great for founders, but
scary for investors.
Eventually, prices fall and IPOs fail - leading to a quick
re pricing when serious numbers return leading to 2 becoming 1. Paul Simon was
very perceptive and may offer some cautionary lessons for tech investors. Venture
Capitalist must be attentive of cycles and beware extrapolating recent positive
trends.
Sorry to rain on the parade.
j
No comments:
Post a Comment