Facebook is acquiring WhatsApp for $19B of which $15B is in stock. Reaction rages from skepticism-repeat of the 1990s dotcom bubble-to euphoria as a brilliant move. Here are some facts:
- WhatsApp is a 4 year old firm with 55 employees. It has 450 mln users. If they pay $1 each it will generate sales of $450 mln in 2014.Thus, Facebook is paying a price to sale multiple of over 40 based on trailing number of users.
- The $19B price exceeds the market value of such well known names as Xerox ($13B) and Nordstrom ($11B).
- WhatsApp had an implied venture capital value of $1.5B in July, 2013.
- Google was allegedly prepared to offer $10B for WhatsApp.
- Facebook has a market value of $170B. The market reacted favorably to announced transaction.
- Facebook has a price earnings ratio of 55 compared to 23 and 14 for Google and Microsoft respectively.
- The previous Internet deals exceeding $10B in market value flopped-the biggest being the Time Warner AOL deal.
- Internet firms have an average life of around 11 years. Thus, Facebook is middle aged.
I understand the difficulty applying traditional valuation techniques like comparable and discounted cash flow to rapidly growing technology based firms. Nonetheless, I continue to rely on the following bedrock principles:
- Value is an opinion about what you may receive in the future. Price is a fact you pay for now.
- At some price even an excellent firm becomes a bad investment.
- Evaluate companies not industries.
- Beware of cash flow proxy measures like price per user. Eventually, they must tie back to cash.
- Access the Real Option Value of high growth investments, but be careful and make sure they are options and not just hopes or beliefs.
- Estimate the performance need to justify the price and determine whether it can be realistically obtained within a reasonable time period.
- Using stock as the primary form of consideration can help mitigate the acquirer’s risk.
- Do not forget about time and present values-how long do we have to wait?
Let’s focus on # 6 for now and assume the following:
- We can value WhatsApp at Facebook’s current Price earnings ratio of 55 in 5 years
- This implies breakeven profits of $363 MLN are needed in 2019.
- Assume a 20% net income margin.
- Required revenues of $1.8B are needed in 2019.
- The users required to generate that revenue are around 1.8B compared with current 450 MLN users-about 280 MLN new users p.a. are required.
We have ignored the 5 year time lag, ability to scale up and grow that fast and the impact of competitors and new technology on margins. This is of course just one, and a favorable one at that, of many possible scenarios.
The above indicates that while difficult-it is possible the deal could work financially. Facebook’s use of its potentially overvalued stock for over 75% of the purchase price helps cushion the downside. This is similar to what happened to AOL in the Time Warner transaction. Finally the WhatsApp acquisition could be viewed as a defensive or pre emptive transaction to keep Google, Facebook’s arch competitor, at bay. In M&A there are two different types of errors. The first is a type I error in making an over priced acquisition. There is also, however, a type II error from not making a good purchase and suffering possible adverse competitive consequences. The short average internet firm life span of 11 years suggests the cost of inaction - a type II error- outweighs the risk of a type I error.
I am not trying to justify the transaction. Rather, I am trying to understand it. It is a big bet for high stakes. It will be interesting to see how it plays out.
J