In recent research with my colleagues David Becher and Jared Wilson, we find that stability is far from common with acquiring firm boards. There are significant and substantial changes of boards over time and the changes are significantly different around mergers. As just one indication the post-merger board typically consists of 7% target directors, but 11% of new directors unaffiliated with either target or bidder before the deal. In addition, board size often changes either increasing or decreasing
Abstract
"This
paper examines the stability and composition of acquirer boards around mergers.
Contrary to perceived wisdom,
composition of the post-merger board changes substantially and these variations
are significantly different from both non-merger years and non-merging firms. These adjustments reflect firms upgrading skills associated with executive and deal
experience. Board changes also reflect
bargaining between targets and acquirers rather than CEOs seeking a more
friendly board. Conversely, director
selection in non-merger years is driven by general skills and diversity. Overall,
our analyses provide insight into the dynamic nature of board structure around
mergers and characteristics valued in the director labor market."
All the best,
Ralph
No comments:
Post a Comment