Firms have largely recovered from their near death 2008
Great Recession experience with margins and stock prices exceeding pre crisis
highs. Revenue growth, however, remains disappointing. A low growth, low
interest rate environment is partly responsible. Consequently, many firms have
focused on cost cutting efficiency improvement and curtailed organic growth
related CAPEX and working capital investments. Thus, free cash flow (EBIT [1-t)
+DA-[CAPEX+WCI]) has grown resulting in excess cash. Firms have responded with
massive dividend and share repurchases which could exceed $1T this year.
This development appears to have run its course. Repurchases
are becoming difficult to justify at current price levels. Thus, investors are
now seeking firms who grow their operations, not just increase shareholder near
term distributions. Of course, not all firms can achieve such growth.
Organic
growth still remains tough. Therefore, firms are increasingly turning to
acquisitions to achieve growth objectives. This is reflected in near record
M&A volumes. As previously
mentioned this comes with increased risk. The Q ratio, a quasi
-market to book ratio indicates stock prices are fully priced. The “q” is at
its highest levels since the 2000 tech boom peak and well above its historical
mean. Adding the usual 30-40% M&A premium means you need to improve the
targets’ contribution by 60-80% to cover the premium and yield a “home
run”-sounds tough because it is.
Making acquisitions
in such a market becomes tricky unless managers can clearly distinguish between
good and bad growth. Good growth occurs when returns on assets (ROA) exceed
their cost of capital (WACC). Acquisitions earning more than cost yield such
growth and increase shareholder value. The levers management can pull to
achieve such results is to control how much they pay and make sure they execute
to achieve the required synergies to earn out the purchase price premium. The
higher the premium the more difficult this becomes. Failure to achieve
ROA>WACC results in bad growth. Revenues may increase, but shareholder value
suffers. This is usually a time lag before this result becomes clear, and by
then the damage is done.
A checklist I use to help me sort thru these issues is:
I hope managers are not acquiring out of desperation over
what to do with their excess cash. It is always better to return the cash to
shareholders than making poorly advised acquisitions.
j
No comments:
Post a Comment